10 Performance Rating Scale Examples Scrutinized: Scale Up Your Reviews

As you're looking to improve performance evaluation, it's always a good idea to brush up on the mechanics of performance rating scales.

With a myriad of rating scales out there, which one strikes the right chord? Which resonates with your organization's tempo and aligns with its goals? And, crucially, how do you ensure it's fair and balanced?

This article will:

Look at different types of performance rating scales.
Scrutinize 10 real-life examples you can readily implement or customize within your evaluation frameworks. (We include the scales, the definitions, the whole thing!)
Share a checklist of factors to consider to define a rating scale that delivers transparent, substantial, and constructive feedback to enhance every employee's progress and development.

🔢 What is a performance rating scale?

Performance rating scales are a standardized tool for assessing an employee's job performance based on predetermined criteria or expectations. These evaluations allow organizations to measure how effectively employees fulfill their job responsibilities and contribute to the company's objectives.

In turn, managers can quantify whether performance exceeds expectations regarding their effectiveness, contributions, and output. Additionally, a performance scale lets managers establish explicit performance targets and action plans. These goals provide employees with clear guidance for task completion and skill development, preparing them for employee appraisal.

Performance assessments typically use a rating scale or scoring system to evaluate various facets of an employee's performance, focusing on productivity, work quality, communication, teamwork, problem-solving, adaptability, and alignment with company values.

5-Point performance rating scale on Zavvy — Setting up a 5-point performance rating scale on Zavvy

Why rating scales matter

Performance rating scales provide a standardized framework for evaluating employees. This ensures that all employees are assessed using the same criteria, leading to fairness and consistency in evaluations.

Rating scales are also designed to align with the organization's goals and objectives. They help communicate what's expected from employees regarding performance and behavior. This reduces ambiguity and ensures managers and employees have a shared understanding of performance expectations.

🕵️‍♀️ 6 Types of performance review rating scales

Five-point rating scale

A five-point scale is a commonly used rating system that provides five options for assessing or measuring a particular trait, characteristic, or performance level.

Each option on the scale represents a distinct level of the evaluated attribute.

Often, a five-point scale ranges from a low point to a high point, with a neutral or middle option in the center. The scale is typically represented numerically, with 1 as the lowest level and 5 as the highest.

One example of a 5-point scale is:

unacceptable performance;
partially successful;
fully successful;
superior;
distinguished performance.

A simpler 5-point scale is:

unacceptable;
needs improvement;
acceptable;
good;
excellent.

Three-point rating scale

A three-point scale is a rating system that provides three distinct options for assessing or measuring a particular trait, characteristic, or performance level. Each option on the scale represents a different level of the evaluated attribute.

Like with the five-point rating scale, you can represent a three-point scale numerically or through descriptive labels. The options typically range from a low point to a high point, with one single neutral or middle option in between.

For example, Williams College's Competency-based form uses a 3-point scale with the following ratings:

Exceeds expectations: Performance consistently exceeded expectations in all essential areas of responsibility, and the quality of work overall was excellent.
Effective: Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of responsibility, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good.
Improvement needed: Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of responsibility. The employee needs to acquire and/or develop the necessary skills to build and sustain performance standards.

3-Point Performance rating scale on Zavvy

Four-point rating scale

A four-point scale for performance reviews is a rating system for assessing employee performance across various competencies or tasks. This scale consists of four levels, each representing a different degree of proficiency or achievement.

This type of scale is often preferred because it avoids a neutral or middle option (the 3-point and the 5-point scales have this), compelling the reviewer to make a more definitive judgment about the performance.

Duke University offers a performance rating example on a 4-point system:

Exceeds Expectations

Performance clearly and consistently exceeds communicated performance requirements.
Contributes to the organization's success well beyond job requirements. Contributes unique, innovative, and workable solutions to projects/problems.

Achievements and abilities are obvious to subordinates, peers, managers, and customers.

Fully Achieves Expectations

Performance consistently meets the requirements, standards, or objectives of the job.

Occasionally exceeds requirements. Results can be expected which are timely and accurate with minimum supervision.

Recognizes, participates in, and adjusts to changing situations and work assignments.

"Fully Achieves Expectations" describes solid, fully competent performance.

Needs Improvement

Performance does not consistently meet the requirements, standards, or objectives of the job.
Needs improvement in one or more areas of consistent weakness. Problem areas should be monitored and documented.
Requires guidance and direction to fully achieve/accomplish responsibilities and objectives.

Improvement is required for staff members to fully achieve expectations.

Unsatisfactory

Staff members must have been counseled regarding unsatisfactory performance to receive this rating.

Performance is consistently below requirements and is Unsatisfactory.
Performance meets few or none of the standards/objectives.
Shows failure to follow directions and initiate improvement.
Knowledge inadequate to retain job without improvement.
Corrective action must be outlined and monitored.

Unsatisfactory is a rating that a staff member should not receive twice.

Narrative scales

Narrative scales, also known as qualitative or descriptive scales, are performance rating systems that rely on written feedback rather than numerical or quantitative performance ratings.

Instead of assigning numerical scores or predefined categories, evaluators using narrative scales provide detailed written assessments of an employee's performance.

Let's look at examples of a narrative scale from Williams College's Narrative performance development form.

For each of the outlined performance development competencies, they define 2 levels: Effective and Exceed Expectations.

Personal Leadership and Innovation

Effective: Effectively manages and utilizes time, is self-motivated, and approaches work from a service mindset. Identifies and resolves problems with an eye for quality and continuous improvement.

Exceeds expectations: Takes a strategic approach to organizational challenges. Uses innovative and creative ideas to solve problems and enhance the working environment. Actively evaluates new ways of working and is not afraid to make mistakes in productive ways.

Communication and collaboration.

Effective: Is responsive to the needs and expectations of customers. Demonstrates effective listening skills, proactively shares information, and effectively communicates. Works effectively as part of a team exhibits civility and respect. Solicits input and assistance from others.

Exceeds expectations: Consistently goes above and beyond to serve others and maintains a positive attitude. Asks questions and makes efforts to resolve misinformation and concerns. Hold themselves mutually accountable for the success of the team. Makes time to help colleagues, sharing knowledge and resources.

Narrative performance review scales based on 2 performance ratings on Zavvy

Graphic scales

A graphic scale for employee performance rating is a visual representation of a performance evaluation tool. It uses a graphical format (often a line or a bar) with labeled intervals to assess and communicate an employee's performance level. This type of scale provides a clear, visual, and easily understandable way to gauge performance.

Behaviorally-anchored rating scales

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) are a distinctive approach to employee performance assessment, offering a more comprehensive and precise measurement than conventional Likert or 1-5 scales.

This method employs a detailed evaluation framework, using various criteria, ranging from excellent to unsatisfactory, to assess employee performance.

The primary objective of BARS is to deliver highly accurate, objective, and dependable evaluations during performance appraisals. It achieves this by honing in on specific, observable behaviors directly relevant to job requirements and desired outcomes.

Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale for a Customer Support Team

5️⃣ 5-Point performance rating scale examples

Let's see real-life examples of rating scales in action, starting with the 5-point scale.

The University of Maryland, Baltimore recommends a simple 5-point performance rating scale with the following 5 rating options:

Outstanding: The employee's work consistently exceeded expectations.
Above Standards: The majority of the employee's work exceeded expectations.
Meets Standards: Performance fully met the established job expectations and may have periodically exceeded expectations.
Below Standards: Performance met some of the job expectations but did not fully meet the established measures.
Unsatisfactory: Performance generally failed to meet the established expectations or required frequent, close supervision and/or the redoing of work.

5-Point Performance Rating Scale Example

Their documentation further expands on the descriptions for each of the rating options. For example, this is the complete description for someone worthy of the "Above standards" rating:

 Above standards
Performance consistently exceeds the requirements needed to fulfill the principal duties,
responsibilities, objectives, and expectations of the position.
Frequently integrates a wide variety of technical, managerial, and other skills to effectively solve
problems and carry out duties, responsibilities, and objectives beyond the expectations of the position; makes on-going improvements.
Employee demonstrates proficiency in performing difficult and complex aspects of the job
competently and thoroughly, including extra and unique tasks assigned.
Quality of work is excellent; consistently exceeds performance expectations.
Performance met all major aspects of expectations and exceeded requirements in several key areas.
Performed the most difficult parts of the job competently and thoroughly.
 Adds value to the organization beyond what is expected; one of the key contributors within the
organization and peer group. Contributes significant results of own initiative.

This 5-point rating scale example from Forbes Advisor also leverages numbers for faster results quantification.

5 (Outstanding): Performs significantly above the quality/quantity criteria for this role.
4 (Exceeds Expectations): Generally exceeds the quality/quantity criteria for this role.
3 (Meets Expectations): Meets the set criteria for the designated role.
2 (Needs Improvement): Didn't fully meet the set criteria for the designated role.
1 (Unacceptable): Performs significantly below set criteria.

🙋‍♀️ Behaviorally anchored rating scale examples

These detailed types of rating scales often require extra documentation to be prepared before applying them.

You can use any number of rating points as long as the main focus is on getting as many details as possible on an employee's behavior.

The following behaviorally anchored rating scale examples come from the State of Michigan. They differentiate between job groups, each group having a specific competency model. All groups share the same framework for a behaviorally anchored rating scale with 3 performance levels: needs improvement, meets expectations, and high-performing.

Group one refers to Technical, Office, Administrative Support, Paraprofessional, and Service Occupations (Non-Supervisory) roles. Their competency model consists of 16 competencies:

adaptability;
applied learning;
building customer loyalty;
communication;
contributing to team success;
decision making;
impact;
initiating action;
innovation;
integrity/honesty;
interpersonal skills;
managing work;
quality orientation;
safety awareness;
stress tolerance;
valuing diversity and inclusion;

Group two refers to Business, Human Service, Scientific, and Engineering Professional Classes (Non-Supervisory) roles. Their competency model consists of 15 competencies:

adaptability;
building strategic working relationships;
building trust;
coaching;
continuous learning;
contributing to team success;
customer focus;
communication;
decision making;
follow-up;
initiating action;
innovation;
planning and organizing work;
valuing diversity and inclusion;
work standards;

Group three covers the competency model for managers, consisting of 15 competencies:

adaptability;
communication
customer focus;
decision making;
innovation;
technical/professional knowledge and skills;
valuing diversity and inclusion;
planning and organizing work;
delegating responsibility;
building trust;
developing a successful team;
aligning performance for success;
managing conflict;
facilitating change;
building partnerships;

Let's look at how they define adaptability for the 3 categories of roles:

Competency BARS Level	Technical, Office, Administrative Support Staff	Business, Human Service, Scientific Staff	Managers
Needs Improvement	Procrastinates when there is a needed change or adjustment. Consistently exhibits a negative attitude toward change. Challenges new work procedures. Avoids complying with new requirements or work situations. Exhibits aversion to change. Consistently complains about change. Fails or hesitates to implement change as required. Refuses to accommodate unexpected requests. Does not attempt to understand change.	Makes active attempts to delay or prevent change from occurring. Fails to implement change as required. Is vocally negative or exhibits a negative attitude about change. Refuses to learn new concepts. Challenges new work methods/procedures. Avoids complying with new requirements or work situations. Dwells on how things were done in the past. Lingers in a disoriented state when change occurs; has difficulty accomplishing routine tasks.	Often resistant to changes; defends and continues to rely upon existing/status quo approaches and procedures. Often does not effectively adapt behavior in response to current situational needs. Shows resistance in adjusting to new work processes and task requirements
Meets Expectations	Approaches change with a positive attitude. Exhibits willingness to comply with change; takes change in stride. Quickly responds to change and determines the need for additional adjustment. Copes with change without incident. Carries out instructions as given for implementing new tasks/procedures. Quickly modifies behavior to deal effectively with change. Understands that unforeseen changes occur and willingly incorporates them into their personal work routine. Maintains quality of work when change occurs in the work environment.	Maintains quality of work when changes occur in the work environment. Addresses change with a positive attitude. Understands that changes occur and effectively and efficiently incorporates them into the work routine. Exhibits willingness to comply with change. Quickly modifies behavior to deal with change. Focuses on beneficial aspects of change. Actively seeks information about new work situations.	Effectively adjusts behavior in response to changing work environments and work processes. Works well within an ambiguous situation. Adapts ideas and actions based on input from others. Adjusts personal working style and incorporates process improvements to meet the needs of the situation, individual, department, or agency. Helps others to understand the reasons for change and to maintain composure during it.
High Performing	Anticipates change and creates backup plans before a change occurs. Consistently copes with change without incident. Understands the need for change and embraces new work procedures. Consistently exhibits optimism and enthusiasm for change. Consistently overcomes obstacles resulting from change. Promotes acceptance of change by showing empathy; creates "win-win" scenarios, giving examples and explanations. Consistently acknowledges possible outcomes of change and plans accordingly. Remains focused while experiencing change. Consistently able to adjust their approach to accommodate unique situations.	Enjoys change and continually seeks better methods of accomplishing desired results. Develops innovative solutions to problems that might arise due to change. Consistently motivates others to accept and seek change. Promotes acceptance of change by showing empathy, giving positive examples, and providing explanations. Anticipates change and plans accordingly. Excels in an environment of frequently changing work structures and processes.	Excels in an environment of frequently changing work structures and processes. Identifies opportunities and attains a high level of performance or achievement within a newly changed situation or environment. Anticipates work changes and immediately adapts to new situations and work requirements. Develops employees that are highly effective in responding to frequently changing work requirements and organizational structures.

Now, let's take an extra BARS example and look at how they define the behavioral indicators for the managerial competency of developing a successful team:

 Needs Improvement
Often fails to build consensus in team thoughts and actions; key objectives are not understood by or acted upon by team members.
Does not promote full team involvement in decisions; the leader makes all substantive decisions.
Expects the team to solve problems but does not give enough guidance or support.
Ignores dissension; doesn't attain full team participation; allows one or more team members to unduly influence others.
Does not consider diversity of skills and perspectives in assembling and developing team.
Meets ExpectationsBrings individuals together who effectively work towards solving a problem or goal.
Monitors team progress towards goals and regularly provides feedback to the team regarding progress.
Actively involves the team in decision-making; gives the team credit for successes as well as responsibility for failures. 
Actively seeks ideas and involvement of team members in problem-solving and shares information on why decisions are made.
Creates an environment where team members accept differences in approaches. Values the opinions of others and acts to promote the success of the entire team.
High PerformingLeads teams that are highly effective in producing significant business results; teams are recognized within the organization for their ability to deliver results.
Creates high-performing teams where team members regularly learn from each other and adapt team processes for improved team efficiency and outcomes.
Highly effective in developing and sustaining a high level of team member commitment and "ownership" for decisions and results by team members.
Conveys strong confidence in self and team; builds pride in the team and inspires team members to perform to their fullest. 
Insightfully diagnoses critical skills and capabilities needed by individuals or by the entire team and takes effective action to bring about needed improvement.

3️⃣ 3-Point performance rating scale examples

This University of Michigan rating scale example, for instance, sticks to a 3-point scale but further develops upon the exact criteria behind each point:

Exceeded: The employee's performance far exceeded expectations due to exceptionally high quality of work performed in all essential areas of responsibility, resulting in an overall quality of work that was superior and either included the completion of a major goal or project, or made an exceptional or unique contribution in support of unit, department, or college objectives. This rating is achievable by any employee, though given infrequently.
Achieved: The employee's performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of responsibility, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical annual goals were met. Typically demonstrates proficient knowledge, skills, and abilities for the required work.
Not Achieved: The employee's performance did not consistently meet expectations and failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of responsibility, and/or one or more of the most critical goals were not met. The employee's work failed to meet the goals of the job function and generally falls short of performance goals, even though sometimes approaching goals. The employee provides minimal support to the contributions of the organization.

3-Point Performance Rating Scale Example

🔟 10 Point performance rating scale examples

While not as popular due to its extensiveness, a 10-point performance rating scale is a system where employees are assessed on a scale from 1 to 10, with each point on the scale corresponding to a different level of performance.

This type of scale allows for a higher degree of granularity in evaluating employee performance.

10 Point Performance Rating Scale Examples

Here's an example of a 10-point performance rating scale along with corresponding descriptors:

1: Poor performance: Employee consistently falls far short of meeting performance standards. Significant improvement is needed.

2: Very weak: Employee's performance is consistently below what is expected. Immediate improvement is a must.

3: Weak: Employee's performance is below the expected level, but there are occasional instances of meeting expectations.

4: Below average: Employee consistently meets the expected performance standards, but there's room for refinement and growth.

5: Average: Employee consistently meets all performance standards satisfactorily.

6: Above average: Employee not only meets but consistently exceeds expectations.

7: Good: Employee consistently surpasses performance standards with some notable achievements.

8: Very good: Employee consistently exceeds expectations with significant achievements.

9: Excellent: Employee's performance is consistently exemplary, far surpassing all expectations.

10: Outstanding: Employee's performance is consistently exceptional, demonstrating a level of achievement far beyond what is expected.

10-point performance rating scale on Zavvy

🌟 Competency rating scale 1-5 examples

Competency rating scales help you evaluate employee performance by touching on specific competencies or skills. They prove particularly valuable in assessing whether a job candidate or current employee aligns with the requirements of their role.

These scales are especially useful for performance reviews when aiming to enhance training initiatives within your team or when considering a new hire or promotion. Customized to each specific job role, they gauge employee competencies in critical areas like adaptability, communication, problem-solving, and beyond.

Competencies ratings follow a five or four-point scale such as:

1 - Needs improvement

2 - Below expectations

3 - Meets expectations

4 - Exceeds expectations

5 - Expert (sets a new standard)

We know that many companies are wary of using numbered scales. To mitigate this issue, Berfu Ulusoy, our Learning and Development Manager at Zavvy, recommends ditching the numbers altogether and using a simple scale with labels for more clarity.

Here's a growth rating scale she recommends using:

Developing: Making efforts to improve skills and knowledge.
Expanding: Demonstrating growth and acquiring new competencies.
Evolving: Continuously improving and adapting to challenges.
Advancing: Making significant strides in personal and professional development.
Transforming: Exhibiting exceptional growth, embracing change, and inspiring others.

➡️ Get our free guide to conducting competency-based performance appraisals and learn more about the latest methods of assessing employee skills and competencies.

Zavvy's complete competency framework template

✅ 5 Factors to consider when choosing the right rating scale for your teams

Now that you've got a good grasp on the performance rating scale options you have let's see what you need to take into account before picking one.

The feedback culture in your company

A culture that values positive feedback and honest communication can help create an environment where employees feel comfortable providing constructive feedback and trust that their opinions will be heard and respected.

By taking this into account, you can choose rating scales tailored to the specific needs of individuals in your team and ensure that your employees feel comfortable and supported in the feedback process. Additionally, a well-designed rating scale can encourage employees to provide meaningful, thoughtful feedback that can be used to help improve team performance.

Our expert, Berfu, notes that if you're not feeling comfortable using scales, you can stick to qualitative answers to open-ended questions:

"One method is giving your employees keywords like 'developing' or 'expanding' and asking them to include them when answering the questions. This way, it'll be easier for you to analyze and even quantify qualitative data."

The type of reviews needed

Are you only looking to get manager performance reviews? Or do you want to involve different team members in performance reviews?

If you want to extend performance ratings to the entire organization, Likert or 5-point scales are fairly easy and quick to use, so you can turn to them whenever you want to gather feedback from colleagues, clients, and collaborators. Plus, employees can even use them to self-rate their performance.

Skill and competency assessments on Zavvy - employee self-appraisal survey

The types of role or industry you're in

Customer service roles may require different rating scales than those in a design or web development role. Further, certain industries may require different scales. Simply put, to measure performance accurately, you need the right scales that will support the diversity of criteria you want to test.

Let's go back to our two industry examples.

In a creative role, performance might be measured using criteria such as creativity, collaboration, and innovation.

In contrast, in a customer service environment, performance will be evaluated using criteria such as customer satisfaction, product knowledge, and responsiveness. The latter are easier to measure using quantitative scales like a 5-point system.

The scale's complexity

Qualitative review might require a more detailed rating scale that allows you to capture different aspects of the feedback, such as the quality of the work, the speed of delivery, and the overall customer experience.

On the opposite end, a quantitative review might require a simpler rating scale that focuses on the team's overall performance. Considering the type of reviews needed will help you choose the most suitable rating scale for your team.

Jo Taylor, Founder & MD at Let's Talk Talent, advocates for keeping past performance analysis simple:

"I like the 3 levels of High Performing, Performing, and Development. You could add in needs significant development if you wanted a fourth. With any description, be clear on what you're asking of people and how they can deliver against this.

No one will ever have all High performing. Not even your CEO. So this enables you to have a much more nuanced conversation about where someone is developing but also where they're overperforming."

Training requirements and available resources

Training materials and possibilities are important to consider because they can determine the complexity of the scale for employee performance reviews.

Suppose your team doesn't have access to the right training materials or enough time to learn a complex rating system. In that case, a simpler scale may be more appropriate.

Leadership training plan template word and excel

➡️ Regardless of your rating scale of choice, you can easily customize our free templates and get your reviews in motion as soon as possible.

🏆 8 Best practices for ensuring your performance rating scales drive clarity, consistency, and fairness

8 Best Practices for Defining Performance Rating Scales

Use these eight core best practices when defining the rating scales for your performance review cycles:

Write clear descriptors: Leave little room for ambiguity during employee performance reviews. All raters should have the exact same understanding of what each level means.

Manager feedback on Zavvy - the right pannel shows the role competency model — Manager feedback on Zavvy - the right pannel shows the role and level description

Maintain consistent increments: The difference between each successive level should be consistent. So, not jumping from not meeting to barely meeting or exceeding. There should always be other levels in between.
Include anchor behaviors or examples: This ensures a shared understanding of what performance at each level should look like.
Keep a balanced scale: Stick to an equal number of positive and negative performance levels, so you're not purely using a numerical scale.
Always add a neutral midpoint: This is especially valid for scales with odd points, as a neutral mid-point is useful for capturing average or expected performance.
Be wary of the cultural aspects and language you use: With any performance review, avoid jargon and stay culturally neutral to ensure all points and explanations are understood consistently across diverse groups.
Combine performance ratings with regular feedback sessions for comprehensive performance reviews: Consider adding a calibration step after getting the results from your scales. Stick to our list of recommended steps for holding a fair and productive performance calibration meeting.
Train your managers to ensure consistency in performance ratings across departments: Personal biases can still creep through even when descriptions are super clear. You can avoid these by ensuring your entire leadership team is up to par with the correct rating standards.

Performance Calibration Meeting and Analysis Template

➡️ Measure and boost performance with Zavvy

Regardless of the performance rating scale you opt for, Zavvy is your go-to partner for driving performance and growth.

Elevate your performance reviews with a highly flexible and customizable tool. You have complete power over:

The types of feedback you want to collect (peer, self-evaluations, manager reviews).
The anonymity of the input.
The recurrence and timeline of your cycles.
The kinds of questions you want to ask (qualitative or quantitative).
The kinds of ratings you want to use.
Whether you want to link the questions to your people's competency and career frameworks.
And much, much more.

Gain valuable insights into your workforce by pinpointing high achievers, assessing talent distribution, populating your 9-box grid with accurate data, and identifying potential issues like toxic leadership and more!

Unlock a new level of employee performance insights with Zavvy

With Zavvy, you can effortlessly acknowledge strong performance and establish tailored employee development plans to support your people's professional growth.

Want to get your managers ready for their next performance review? Our experts provide manager workshops and tailored consultations to ensure you set up your organization's ideal feedback and performance review process.

📅 Book a demo of our Zavvy feedback and performance rating suite today!

Zavvy 360 degree growtth system — Holistic people development with Zavvy

❓ FAQs

What is a disadvantage of behaviorally anchored rating scales?

One disadvantage of behaviorally anchored rating scales is that they can be time-consuming and challenging to create. It requires extensive research and analysis to determine the specific behaviors needed for the rating scale. Additionally, since the scale is based on a specific set of behaviors, it can limit the feedback that is provided to employees.

What is the best rating scale for the performance review process?

Managers often find the 5-point scale encompasses the entire spectrum of job performance, ranging from excellent to unsatisfactory. This scale offers a level of detail that provides managers with valuable insights into their employees' work, surpassing the granularity of a ten-point scale. Its simplicity makes it ideal for managers seeking a clear and efficient way to assess contributions, facilitating well-informed decisions regarding employee development and promotion plans.

Can one scale fit all roles within an organization?

No. One standardized scale might not be suitable for all roles within your organization. You need to make meaningful comparisons between managers, departments, roles, etc. However, while different departments or roles might need tailored scales, it's important to have a degree of consistency across the organization to enable broader talent management initiatives, such as succession planning.

Lorelei Trisca

Lorelei is Zavvy's Content Marketing Manager. She is always on the hunt for the latest HR trends, fresh statistics, and academic and real-life best practices to spread the word about creating better employee experiences.